religious right

The Radical Right Roadmap – Paul Weyrich and his disciple, Eric Heubeck

To many of our readers, what you are about to read will put into words events and actions that you have watched unfold, but may not have connected all the dots to see the larger picture of what has happened—how it was planned and executed.

In a now out-of-print article from the (liberal leaning) American Prospect, picked up by the Yurica Report, uber-conservative Paul Weyrich stunned the religious right by calling for a retreat from temporal concerns. “Conservatives have learned to succeed in politics,” he wrote in an open letter which is no longer available on the Web site www.freecongress.org. “But that did not result in the adoption of our agenda. The reason, I think, is that politics itself has failed. And politics has failed because of the collapse of the culture.” The right no longer had a “moral majority,” he wrote. The solution? “To look at ways to separate ourselves from the institutions that have been captured by the ideology of Political Correctness, or by other enemies of our traditional culture.” In essence, he said, the religious right should espouse cultural and political separatism–by setting up its own schools, television networks, and even courts of law.

The rest of the country breathed a sigh of relief. No more silly Disney boycotts by southern Baptists. No more flaky school-board members pushing creationism. No more Paul Weyrich!

The whew, alas, was premature. It turns out that what Weyrich and his folks really had in mind was less separatism than guerrilla warfare–a “New Traditionalist” movement that, according to its manifesto, written by Weyrich protégé Eric Heubeck and bearing the grandiose title “The Integration of Theory and Practice: A Program for the New Traditionalist Movement,” would seek “to advance a true traditionalist counter-culture based on virtue, excellence, and self-discipline.” The New Traditionalists–who sound a lot like the old traditionalists–will “reject the materialism, hedonism, consumerism, egoism, and the cult of self-actualization which permeate modern life.” Heubeck elaborates:

“We will not try to reform existing institutions. We only intend to weaken them, and eventually destroy them. We will endeavor to knock our opponents off-balance and unsettle them at every opportunity. . . . We will maintain a constant barrage of criticism against the Left. We will attack the very legitimacy of the Left. We will not give them a moment’s rest. We will endeavor to prove that the Left does not deserve to hold sway over the heart and mind of a single American.

And we thought you’d forsaken us.

A Time Magazine article added to this that;

“The Bush administration is apparently quite cozy with Weyrich.  Each Wednesday Rove dispatches a top administration official to attend the regular conservative-coalition lunches held at Paul Weyrich’s Free Congress Foundation. When activists call his office with a problem, Rove doesn’t pass them off to an aide. He often responds himself. When Weyrich heard a few weeks ago that Bush’s budget slashed funding for a favorite project called the Police Corps, which gives scholarships and training to police cadets, he complained to the White House. To Weyrich’s surprise, Rove called back. “We’ve taken care of it,” Rove said. “The problem is solved.” Weyrich, who says his memos to the Reagan and Bush Sr. White Houses were rarely read, was impressed. “That,” he gushes, “is what it means to have friends in the White House.” More →

NEA: Anatomy of the Far Right

This is actually an old article I ran across today – from 1998.  The same year Hillary Clinton spoke up about the “vast right-wing conspiracy”.  Published in the conservative Washington Times, the article heaped a lot of scorn on the NEA’s findings But that is not the object of this post…

                                            [note:  “the fold” is in tribute to the writers at the Daily Kos who have been working as a true grassroots movement to expose ALEC]

The NEA report maintains that choking off NEA funding is not an end in itself, “but that the conservative movement considers it “a critical step in achieving its broader aims, a state-by-state assault on public education.”

The report, prepared by NEA researchers led by political
consultant Robert Watson, lists not only such high-profile groups as Heritage and Cato, but also focuses on lesser known organizations that help coordinate state and national conservative strategies, including the Council for National Policy, the American Legislative Exchange Council and the State Policy Network.

The study began in January when the California Teachers Association asked for help fighting Proposition 226, NEA
spokeswoman Kathleen Lyons said. Mr. Watson was hired as project leader for the NEA research effort. By the time Proposition 226 was defeated, the NEA “had compiled a lot of information and … saw it would be useful to a lot of our state and local affiliates,” Miss Lyons said, and decided to prepare a full report for nationwide distribution.

Miss Lyons did a great service documenting what she found back in 1998.  Please check out the infographic that was made from the NEA studies–and then compare it with information that Bob Sloan has researched and published about “The Cabal” here and on the Daily Kos.  Or from some excellent articles we have reposted on this site from Truthout or ALECexposed/Sourcewarch.

You can see the infographic if  you will please click hereShould you print it, be sure to use at least 8.5×14″ paper so that you will be able to read everything very clearly.

The NEA’s work in 1998 was eerily prescient and well assembled as you will see.  You can read the report if you will please click here.  (The link in the article to the report is dead, but here it is from the Archive.)

And if you will please click here you will see that the tenor of conservative comments has not changed since 1998 either.  This is either “extremely” (get the pun?) disturbing, or comedy worthy of George Carlin.